Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maul- und Klauenseuche

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Maul- und Klauenseuche

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Maul- und Klauenseuche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 1950 East German documentary about foot-and-mouth disease? Can't possibly satisfy WP:NFILM. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of notability under any standard. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 07:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
• Comment. Documentaries can be notable. Once notable, always notable. Presumably there was some coverage of the documentary in East German state media at the time. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

• A documentary about Karl Marx maybe. Foot-and-mouth disease, very unlikely, even in East Germany. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

As well, presumed coverage does not contribute towards notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails WP:GNG at this point. No reason for inclusion in English Wikipedia. Perhaps if sourcing is unearthed in the future, we can welcome it back. Missvain (talk) 01:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.