Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gram Games
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Zynga. The target page does need some updating (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 03:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gram Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not really notable It has been deleted twice[1], both for advertising. Remagoxer (talk) 11:35, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect. Since they are now owned by Zynga, it should redirect there. It isn't currently listed in the Zynga article as an "owned studio", but it should be. They were acquired in 2018.
[2] [3] Psu256 (talk) 19:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
References
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP on its own. It could arguably pass by sources on the acquisition (here's another: [1]), but they're more about the acquisition than the company itself (i.e. the "significant coverage" is not really about the company but the acquisition event). Would be better served as a redirect to Zynga. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkH21 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.